Skip to Content
Main content

GEORGE WASHINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

230

48%

LEVEL 2

148

31%

LEVEL 3

76

16%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

220

49%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

85

37%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

92

43%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

145

58%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

128

56%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

37

56%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

33

49%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

108

44%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

61

55%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

64

60%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

177

42%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

156

41%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

53

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

64

93%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

206

54%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

193

55%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.