Skip to Content
Main content

CASSADAGA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

116

38%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

116

43%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

44

90%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

39

78%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

68

48%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

62

44%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

89

50%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

79

43%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.