Skip to Content
Main content

RANDOLPH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

54

32%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

79

25%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

120

38%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

33

73%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

53

33%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

75

36%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.