WHITNEY POINT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

186

36%

LEVEL 2

187

36%

LEVEL 3

101

20%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

200

36%

LEVEL 2

189

34%

LEVEL 3

111

20%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

101

39%

LEVEL 2

97

37%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

126

45%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

177

36%

LEVEL 2

182

37%

LEVEL 3

98

20%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

192

36%

LEVEL 2

180

34%

LEVEL 3

107

20%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

122

28%

LEVEL 2

181

41%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

119

27%

LEVEL 2

172

38%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

64

89%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

81

80%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

44

22%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

149

45%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

156

44%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.