Skip to Content
Main content

HARPURSVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

122

46%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

48

38%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

40

35%

LEVEL 2

50

44%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

80

49%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

82

54%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

118

44%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

116

47%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

97

45%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

40

89%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

38

79%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

39

35%

LEVEL 2

47

42%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

21

26%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

89

51%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

101

55%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.