SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

138

26%

LEVEL 2

212

39%

LEVEL 3

151

28%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

106

21%

LEVEL 2

199

39%

LEVEL 3

159

31%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

90

30%

LEVEL 2

125

41%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

63

23%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

117

24%

LEVEL 2

184

38%

LEVEL 3

141

29%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

94

20%

LEVEL 2

182

39%

LEVEL 3

147

31%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

86

18%

LEVEL 2

203

43%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

77

17%

LEVEL 2

177

38%

LEVEL 3

157

34%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

52

83%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

82

37%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.