Skip to Content
Main content

WEST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

209

45%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

187

40%

LEVEL 2

183

39%

LEVEL 3

72

15%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

91

43%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

80

37%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

118

47%

LEVEL 2

102

41%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

107

42%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

83

36%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

84

39%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

74

64%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

82

59%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

27

57%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

22

49%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

142

36%

LEVEL 2

168

43%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

128

33%

LEVEL 2

166

42%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

67

94%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

59

76%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

62

44%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

166

53%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

158

48%

LEVEL 2

121

37%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.