CHENANGO FORKS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

195

33%

LEVEL 2

216

36%

LEVEL 3

143

24%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

169

28%

LEVEL 2

226

37%

LEVEL 3

146

24%

LEVEL 4

66

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

77

27%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

71

25%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

118

38%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

98

30%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

177

32%

LEVEL 2

198

36%

LEVEL 3

137

25%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

149

27%

LEVEL 2

209

38%

LEVEL 3

139

25%

LEVEL 4

60

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

126

24%

LEVEL 2

210

40%

LEVEL 3

142

27%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

114

21%

LEVEL 2

207

39%

LEVEL 3

145

27%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

69

91%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

55

73%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

114

46%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

108

41%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.