VOORHEESVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

152

41%

LEVEL 4

87

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

122

36%

LEVEL 4

88

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

62

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

60

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

76

42%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

62

38%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

213
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

140

42%

LEVEL 4

73

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

79

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

149

45%

LEVEL 4

87

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

120

39%

LEVEL 4

87

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

18

51%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

144

42%

LEVEL 4

84

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

86

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.