ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

212

42%

LEVEL 2

183

37%

LEVEL 3

82

16%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

195

39%

LEVEL 2

185

37%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

118

50%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

118

48%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

204

43%

LEVEL 2

175

37%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

185

39%

LEVEL 2

179

37%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

139

33%

LEVEL 2

173

41%

LEVEL 3

82

20%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

126

31%

LEVEL 2

167

41%

LEVEL 3

94

23%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

73

88%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

69

78%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

70

40%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

156

49%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

146

45%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.