BRONX PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

178

51%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

157

46%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

98

54%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

70

43%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

80

49%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

87

48%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

98

56%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

83

47%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

161

54%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

136

46%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

25

51%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

23

48%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

97
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

168

53%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

123
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

149

46%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

24

56%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

154

51%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

141

46%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.