Skip to Content
Main content

HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY EAST CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

93

30%

LEVEL 2

146

47%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

92

26%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

68

44%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

68

38%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

59

37%

LEVEL 2

78

49%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

86

48%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

59

47%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

129

51%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

43

72%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

39

52%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

140

47%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

16

30%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

12

25%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

123

47%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.