Skip to Content
Main content

EXCELLENCE BOYS CS-BEDFORD STUY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

183

44%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

184

38%

LEVEL 4

75

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

161
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

169

45%

LEVEL 3

113

30%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

225
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

162

39%

LEVEL 3

161

38%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

143

42%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

162

40%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

24

32%

LEVEL 2

40

53%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

36

46%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

252
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

177

38%

LEVEL 4

75

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

60

45%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

48

36%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

136

39%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.