HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE PROMISE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

242

44%

LEVEL 3

174

32%

LEVEL 4

37

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

80

15%

LEVEL 2

212

39%

LEVEL 3

203

37%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

133

47%

LEVEL 3

100

35%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

180
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

202

43%

LEVEL 3

149

32%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

222
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

173

37%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

30

50%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

30

46%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

52

12%

LEVEL 2

197

44%

LEVEL 3

158

36%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

185

40%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

43

41%

LEVEL 2

45

43%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

30

33%

LEVEL 2

41

45%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

210
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

89

17%

LEVEL 2

240

45%

LEVEL 3

173

32%

LEVEL 4

37

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

256
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

207

38%

LEVEL 3

203

38%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

19

20%

LEVEL 2

35

37%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

32

41%

LEVEL 3

28

36%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

76

17%

LEVEL 2

207

46%

LEVEL 3

141

31%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

180

38%

LEVEL 3

175

37%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.