YORK EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

122

44%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

103

39%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

73

46%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

47

40%

LEVEL 3

49

42%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

48

38%

LEVEL 4

31

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

16
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

13

45%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

29
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

17

43%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

39

52%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

28

41%

LEVEL 4

20

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

78
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

52

41%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

70
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

45

39%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

118

47%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

98

42%

LEVEL 4

63

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

16

64%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

15

54%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

26

44%

LEVEL 4

14

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

26

44%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

96

44%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

77

38%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.