Skip to Content
Main content

KINGSBOROUGH EARLY COLLEGE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

101

46%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

44

44%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

46

38%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

57

47%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

16

26%

LEVEL 2

34

56%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

13

19%

LEVEL 2

33

48%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

40

49%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

88

47%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

17

44%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

14

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

84

46%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.