Skip to Content
Main content

COLUMBIA SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

98

38%

LEVEL 4

126

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

98

36%

LEVEL 4

140

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

73

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

85

63%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

52

41%

LEVEL 4

53

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

60

44%

LEVEL 4

55

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

19

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

17

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

36

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

19

38%

LEVEL 4

29

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

29

48%

LEVEL 4

17

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

54
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

22

30%

LEVEL 4

32

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

34

36%

LEVEL 4

42

45%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

38

37%

LEVEL 4

55

53%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

97

40%

LEVEL 4

126

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

139

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

9%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

71

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

56

42%

LEVEL 4

70

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

55

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

70

51%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.