Skip to Content
Main content

GASKILL PREPARATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

208

46%

LEVEL 2

159

35%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

185

42%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

63

14%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

89

41%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

78

38%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

119

51%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

107

45%

LEVEL 2

93

39%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

54

34%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

119

56%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

112

53%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

154

40%

LEVEL 2

145

38%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

54

79%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

56

70%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

38

36%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

170

49%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

164

47%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.