BRONX ACADEMY OF PROMISE CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

180

46%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

198

49%

LEVEL 3

133

33%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

82

41%

LEVEL 3

79

40%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

98

52%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

112

57%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

80
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

80

45%

LEVEL 3

70

39%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

82
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

87

48%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

97

49%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

110

50%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

149

45%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

160

46%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

15

26%

LEVEL 2

31

53%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

38

67%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

153
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

138

42%

LEVEL 3

126

39%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

166
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

155

44%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

42

68%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

43

75%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

80

56%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

124

50%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

118

45%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.