Skip to Content
Main content

EQUITY PROJECT CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

149

32%

LEVEL 2

205

44%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

130

27%

LEVEL 2

195

41%

LEVEL 3

107

23%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

114

45%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

80

36%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

140

32%

LEVEL 2

193

44%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

140
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

123

28%

LEVEL 2

179

40%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

175

47%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

166

47%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

60

61%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

72

62%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

173

47%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

80

21%

LEVEL 2

157

41%

LEVEL 3

104

27%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

71

68%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

50

55%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

187

44%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

120

28%

LEVEL 2

182

42%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.