BROOKLYN SCHOLARS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

221

50%

LEVEL 3

133

30%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

79

17%

LEVEL 2

208

45%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

115

49%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

113

45%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

106

52%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

95

44%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

13

45%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

113
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

158

51%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

119
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

142

45%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

49

52%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

53

50%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

204

52%

LEVEL 3

126

32%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

189

46%

LEVEL 3

142

34%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

23

47%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

26

52%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

115

52%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

14

50%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

106

49%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

78

18%

LEVEL 2

194

44%

LEVEL 3

134

31%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.