Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCHOOL OF INQUIRY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

128

41%

LEVEL 4

147

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

40

11%

LEVEL 3

150

42%

LEVEL 4

163

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

94

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

105

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

72

49%

LEVEL 4

53

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

85

51%

LEVEL 4

58

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

26

45%

LEVEL 4

28

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

32

44%

LEVEL 4

35

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

91

42%

LEVEL 4

101

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

213
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

100

41%

LEVEL 4

113

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

12

60%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

107

42%

LEVEL 4

124

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

120

41%

LEVEL 4

138

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

21

34%

LEVEL 4

23

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

30

45%

LEVEL 4

25

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.