Skip to Content
Main content

INWOOD ACAD FOR LEADERSHIP CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

178

38%

LEVEL 2

205

44%

LEVEL 3

68

14%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

139

30%

LEVEL 2

190

41%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

73

33%

LEVEL 2

95

43%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

105

42%

LEVEL 2

110

44%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

89

35%

LEVEL 2

111

43%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

165

37%

LEVEL 2

199

45%

LEVEL 3

64

14%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

130
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

131

29%

LEVEL 2

184

41%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

108

29%

LEVEL 2

176

48%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

147

41%

LEVEL 3

103

29%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

70

69%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

58

55%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

186

48%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

134
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

100

25%

LEVEL 2

166

42%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

61

76%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

39

58%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

66

50%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

25

32%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

132

39%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

114

29%

LEVEL 2

161

41%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.