Skip to Content
Main content

30TH AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

48

73%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

7%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

121

62%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

27

79%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

73

72%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

21

66%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

48

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

31

84%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

88
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

69

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

35

65%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

10

56%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

119

64%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

34

74%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

89

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

14

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

32

62%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.