NASSAU COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26,830
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 50,800

LEVEL 1

8,506

17%

LEVEL 2

15,464

30%

LEVEL 3

16,858

33%

LEVEL 4

9,972

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31,344
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 53,761

LEVEL 1

7,902

15%

LEVEL 2

14,515

27%

LEVEL 3

18,744

35%

LEVEL 4

12,600

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14,453
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,497

LEVEL 1

3,154

13%

LEVEL 2

6,890

28%

LEVEL 3

8,581

35%

LEVEL 4

5,872

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16,640
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,902

LEVEL 1

2,820

11%

LEVEL 2

6,442

25%

LEVEL 3

9,424

36%

LEVEL 4

7,216

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12,377
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,303

LEVEL 1

5,352

20%

LEVEL 2

8,574

33%

LEVEL 3

8,277

31%

LEVEL 4

4,100

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14,704
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 27,859

LEVEL 1

5,082

18%

LEVEL 2

8,073

29%

LEVEL 3

9,320

33%

LEVEL 4

5,384

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

519
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 831

LEVEL 1

83

10%

LEVEL 2

229

28%

LEVEL 3

300

36%

LEVEL 4

219

26%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

669
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 991

LEVEL 1

91

9%

LEVEL 2

231

23%

LEVEL 3

355

36%

LEVEL 4

314

32%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

42
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

32

36%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7,268
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,117

LEVEL 1

671

7%

LEVEL 2

2,178

22%

LEVEL 3

3,781

37%

LEVEL 4

3,487

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8,366
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,889

LEVEL 1

635

6%

LEVEL 2

1,888

17%

LEVEL 3

4,062

37%

LEVEL 4

4,304

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12,072
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,175

LEVEL 1

1,612

8%

LEVEL 2

5,491

29%

LEVEL 3

7,662

40%

LEVEL 4

4,410

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13,500
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,079

LEVEL 1

1,611

8%

LEVEL 2

4,968

25%

LEVEL 3

8,115

40%

LEVEL 4

5,385

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,737
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,393

LEVEL 1

1,955

26%

LEVEL 2

2,701

37%

LEVEL 3

1,959

26%

LEVEL 4

778

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3,208
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,381

LEVEL 1

1,730

23%

LEVEL 2

2,443

33%

LEVEL 3

2,189

30%

LEVEL 4

1,019

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,192
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,194

LEVEL 1

4,169

32%

LEVEL 2

4,833

37%

LEVEL 3

3,124

24%

LEVEL 4

1,068

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5,548
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,304

LEVEL 1

3,817

27%

LEVEL 2

4,939

35%

LEVEL 3

3,987

28%

LEVEL 4

1,561

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26,253
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,196

LEVEL 1

6,015

13%

LEVEL 2

13,928

30%

LEVEL 3

16,373

35%

LEVEL 4

9,880

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30,466
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 48,774

LEVEL 1

5,526

11%

LEVEL 2

12,782

26%

LEVEL 3

18,032

37%

LEVEL 4

12,434

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

577
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,604

LEVEL 1

2,491

54%

LEVEL 2

1,536

33%

LEVEL 3

485

11%

LEVEL 4

92

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

878
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,987

LEVEL 1

2,376

48%

LEVEL 2

1,733

35%

LEVEL 3

712

14%

LEVEL 4

166

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26,597
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,914

LEVEL 1

5,919

13%

LEVEL 2

14,398

31%

LEVEL 3

16,640

35%

LEVEL 4

9,957

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30,852
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 49,148

LEVEL 1

5,362

11%

LEVEL 2

12,934

26%

LEVEL 3

18,282

37%

LEVEL 4

12,570

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

233
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,886

LEVEL 1

2,587

67%

LEVEL 2

1,066

27%

LEVEL 3

218

6%

LEVEL 4

15

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

492
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,613

LEVEL 1

2,540

55%

LEVEL 2

1,581

34%

LEVEL 3

462

10%

LEVEL 4

30

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,347
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,958

LEVEL 1

3,376

10%

LEVEL 2

9,235

27%

LEVEL 3

12,812

38%

LEVEL 4

8,535

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23,698
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,444

LEVEL 1

2,821

8%

LEVEL 2

7,925

23%

LEVEL 3

13,423

39%

LEVEL 4

10,275

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,483
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,842

LEVEL 1

5,130

30%

LEVEL 2

6,229

37%

LEVEL 3

4,046

24%

LEVEL 4

1,437

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,646
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,317

LEVEL 1

5,081

26%

LEVEL 2

6,590

34%

LEVEL 3

5,321

28%

LEVEL 4

2,325

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.