KINGS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57,733
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 136,607

LEVEL 1

33,017

24%

LEVEL 2

45,857

34%

LEVEL 3

37,107

27%

LEVEL 4

20,626

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67,506
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 137,593

LEVEL 1

29,499

21%

LEVEL 2

40,588

29%

LEVEL 3

40,805

30%

LEVEL 4

26,701

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32,536
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 67,432

LEVEL 1

12,930

19%

LEVEL 2

21,966

33%

LEVEL 3

19,926

30%

LEVEL 4

12,610

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37,339
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 67,918

LEVEL 1

11,328

17%

LEVEL 2

19,251

28%

LEVEL 3

21,640

32%

LEVEL 4

15,699

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25,197
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 69,175

LEVEL 1

20,087

29%

LEVEL 2

23,891

35%

LEVEL 3

17,181

25%

LEVEL 4

8,016

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30,167
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 69,675

LEVEL 1

18,171

26%

LEVEL 2

21,337

31%

LEVEL 3

19,165

28%

LEVEL 4

11,002

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

788
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,228

LEVEL 1

146

12%

LEVEL 2

294

24%

LEVEL 3

420

34%

LEVEL 4

368

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

985
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,425

LEVEL 1

147

10%

LEVEL 2

293

21%

LEVEL 3

523

37%

LEVEL 4

462

32%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

391
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,043

LEVEL 1

283

27%

LEVEL 2

369

35%

LEVEL 3

261

25%

LEVEL 4

130

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

458
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,070

LEVEL 1

263

25%

LEVEL 2

349

33%

LEVEL 3

281

26%

LEVEL 4

177

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12,602
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,118

LEVEL 1

3,630

16%

LEVEL 2

5,886

27%

LEVEL 3

6,991

32%

LEVEL 4

5,611

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14,447
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,727

LEVEL 1

3,327

15%

LEVEL 2

4,953

22%

LEVEL 3

7,197

32%

LEVEL 4

7,250

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13,540
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,324

LEVEL 1

3,129

14%

LEVEL 2

5,655

25%

LEVEL 3

7,333

33%

LEVEL 4

6,207

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15,069
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,778

LEVEL 1

2,824

12%

LEVEL 2

4,885

21%

LEVEL 3

7,701

34%

LEVEL 4

7,368

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17,983
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51,059

LEVEL 1

13,842

27%

LEVEL 2

19,234

38%

LEVEL 3

12,992

25%

LEVEL 4

4,991

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21,223
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 50,462

LEVEL 1

12,358

24%

LEVEL 2

16,881

33%

LEVEL 3

14,509

29%

LEVEL 4

6,714

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12,429
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38,835

LEVEL 1

11,987

31%

LEVEL 2

14,419

37%

LEVEL 3

9,110

23%

LEVEL 4

3,319

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15,324
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 39,131

LEVEL 1

10,580

27%

LEVEL 2

13,227

34%

LEVEL 3

10,594

27%

LEVEL 4

4,730

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54,575
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 109,932

LEVEL 1

18,085

16%

LEVEL 2

37,272

34%

LEVEL 3

34,493

31%

LEVEL 4

20,082

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62,500
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 109,785

LEVEL 1

15,882

14%

LEVEL 2

31,403

29%

LEVEL 3

36,817

34%

LEVEL 4

25,683

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3,158
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,675

LEVEL 1

14,932

56%

LEVEL 2

8,585

32%

LEVEL 3

2,614

10%

LEVEL 4

544

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5,006
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 27,808

LEVEL 1

13,617

49%

LEVEL 2

9,185

33%

LEVEL 3

3,988

14%

LEVEL 4

1,018

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

56,782
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 122,107

LEVEL 1

23,756

19%

LEVEL 2

41,569

34%

LEVEL 3

36,224

30%

LEVEL 4

20,558

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65,619
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 121,832

LEVEL 1

20,757

17%

LEVEL 2

35,456

29%

LEVEL 3

39,085

32%

LEVEL 4

26,534

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

951
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,500

LEVEL 1

9,261

64%

LEVEL 2

4,288

30%

LEVEL 3

883

6%

LEVEL 4

68

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,887
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,761

LEVEL 1

8,742

55%

LEVEL 2

5,132

33%

LEVEL 3

1,720

11%

LEVEL 4

167

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,262
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 36,630

LEVEL 1

5,407

15%

LEVEL 2

9,961

27%

LEVEL 3

11,976

33%

LEVEL 4

9,286

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20,681
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,529

LEVEL 1

3,113

10%

LEVEL 2

6,735

22%

LEVEL 3

10,528

34%

LEVEL 4

10,153

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36,471
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 99,977

LEVEL 1

27,610

28%

LEVEL 2

35,896

36%

LEVEL 3

25,131

25%

LEVEL 4

11,340

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46,825
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 107,064

LEVEL 1

26,386

25%

LEVEL 2

33,853

32%

LEVEL 3

30,277

28%

LEVEL 4

16,548

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.