Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57,620
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 126,437

LEVEL 1

26,830

21%

LEVEL 2

41,987

33%

LEVEL 3

35,886

28%

LEVEL 4

21,734

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66,009
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 126,678

LEVEL 1

24,211

19%

LEVEL 2

36,458

29%

LEVEL 3

38,317

30%

LEVEL 4

27,692

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31,923
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 61,582

LEVEL 1

10,019

16%

LEVEL 2

19,640

32%

LEVEL 3

18,954

31%

LEVEL 4

12,969

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35,902
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 61,788

LEVEL 1

8,993

15%

LEVEL 2

16,893

27%

LEVEL 3

19,852

32%

LEVEL 4

16,050

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25,697
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 64,855

LEVEL 1

16,811

26%

LEVEL 2

22,347

34%

LEVEL 3

16,932

26%

LEVEL 4

8,765

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30,107
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 64,890

LEVEL 1

15,218

23%

LEVEL 2

19,565

30%

LEVEL 3

18,465

28%

LEVEL 4

11,642

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

610
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,008

LEVEL 1

134

13%

LEVEL 2

264

26%

LEVEL 3

305

30%

LEVEL 4

305

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

791
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,144

LEVEL 1

146

13%

LEVEL 2

207

18%

LEVEL 3

400

35%

LEVEL 4

391

34%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

882
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,233

LEVEL 1

537

24%

LEVEL 2

814

36%

LEVEL 3

612

27%

LEVEL 4

270

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1,090
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,334

LEVEL 1

509

22%

LEVEL 2

735

31%

LEVEL 3

701

30%

LEVEL 4

389

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23,511
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 37,626

LEVEL 1

4,306

11%

LEVEL 2

9,809

26%

LEVEL 3

12,545

33%

LEVEL 4

10,966

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26,035
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 37,851

LEVEL 1

3,922

10%

LEVEL 2

7,894

21%

LEVEL 3

12,639

33%

LEVEL 4

13,396

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,219
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,077

LEVEL 1

2,253

14%

LEVEL 2

4,605

29%

LEVEL 3

5,332

33%

LEVEL 4

3,887

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10,111
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,911

LEVEL 1

1,966

12%

LEVEL 2

3,834

24%

LEVEL 3

5,346

34%

LEVEL 4

4,765

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6,852
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,561

LEVEL 1

6,379

30%

LEVEL 2

8,330

39%

LEVEL 3

5,018

23%

LEVEL 4

1,834

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8,051
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,185

LEVEL 1

5,788

27%

LEVEL 2

7,346

35%

LEVEL 3

5,631

27%

LEVEL 4

2,420

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16,546
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,932

LEVEL 1

13,221

28%

LEVEL 2

18,165

38%

LEVEL 3

12,074

25%

LEVEL 4

4,472

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19,931
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 48,253

LEVEL 1

11,880

25%

LEVEL 2

16,442

34%

LEVEL 3

13,600

28%

LEVEL 4

6,331

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55,216
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 104,222

LEVEL 1

14,539

14%

LEVEL 2

34,467

33%

LEVEL 3

33,826

32%

LEVEL 4

21,390

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62,257
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 103,902

LEVEL 1

13,091

13%

LEVEL 2

28,554

27%

LEVEL 3

35,276

34%

LEVEL 4

26,981

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2,404
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,215

LEVEL 1

12,291

55%

LEVEL 2

7,520

34%

LEVEL 3

2,060

9%

LEVEL 4

344

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3,752
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,776

LEVEL 1

11,120

49%

LEVEL 2

7,904

35%

LEVEL 3

3,041

13%

LEVEL 4

711

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56,652
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 112,014

LEVEL 1

17,950

16%

LEVEL 2

37,412

33%

LEVEL 3

34,980

31%

LEVEL 4

21,672

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64,121
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 110,700

LEVEL 1

15,589

14%

LEVEL 2

30,990

28%

LEVEL 3

36,577

33%

LEVEL 4

27,544

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

968
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,423

LEVEL 1

8,880

62%

LEVEL 2

4,575

32%

LEVEL 3

906

6%

LEVEL 4

62

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,888
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,978

LEVEL 1

8,622

54%

LEVEL 2

5,468

34%

LEVEL 3

1,740

11%

LEVEL 4

148

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22,638
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 40,193

LEVEL 1

6,146

15%

LEVEL 2

11,409

28%

LEVEL 3

12,685

32%

LEVEL 4

9,953

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,550
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,619

LEVEL 1

3,665

11%

LEVEL 2

7,404

23%

LEVEL 3

10,836

33%

LEVEL 4

10,714

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34,982
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 86,244

LEVEL 1

20,684

24%

LEVEL 2

30,578

35%

LEVEL 3

23,201

27%

LEVEL 4

11,781

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44,459
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 94,059

LEVEL 1

20,546

22%

LEVEL 2

29,054

31%

LEVEL 3

27,481

29%

LEVEL 4

16,978

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.