Skip to Content
Main content

RICHMOND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,329
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,843

LEVEL 1

5,591

21%

LEVEL 2

8,923

33%

LEVEL 3

7,811

29%

LEVEL 4

4,518

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14,066
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,866

LEVEL 1

4,977

19%

LEVEL 2

7,823

29%

LEVEL 3

8,258

31%

LEVEL 4

5,808

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,904
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,053

LEVEL 1

1,996

15%

LEVEL 2

4,153

32%

LEVEL 3

4,158

32%

LEVEL 4

2,746

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7,796
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,092

LEVEL 1

1,801

14%

LEVEL 2

3,495

27%

LEVEL 3

4,328

33%

LEVEL 4

3,468

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,425
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,790

LEVEL 1

3,595

26%

LEVEL 2

4,770

35%

LEVEL 3

3,653

26%

LEVEL 4

1,772

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,270
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,774

LEVEL 1

3,176

23%

LEVEL 2

4,328

31%

LEVEL 3

3,930

29%

LEVEL 4

2,340

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

160
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

70

21%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

233
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

71

18%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

96

24%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

49
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

43

35%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

53
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

37

31%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,477
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,261

LEVEL 1

224

10%

LEVEL 2

560

25%

LEVEL 3

769

34%

LEVEL 4

708

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,762
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,497

LEVEL 1

211

8%

LEVEL 2

524

21%

LEVEL 3

877

35%

LEVEL 4

885

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7,126
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,711

LEVEL 1

1,623

13%

LEVEL 2

3,962

31%

LEVEL 3

4,366

34%

LEVEL 4

2,760

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7,773
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,269

LEVEL 1

1,336

11%

LEVEL 2

3,160

26%

LEVEL 3

4,283

35%

LEVEL 4

3,490

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

999
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,683

LEVEL 1

1,379

37%

LEVEL 2

1,305

35%

LEVEL 3

738

20%

LEVEL 4

261

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,127
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,652

LEVEL 1

1,256

34%

LEVEL 2

1,269

35%

LEVEL 3

798

22%

LEVEL 4

329

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,518
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,734

LEVEL 1

2,252

29%

LEVEL 2

2,964

38%

LEVEL 3

1,805

23%

LEVEL 4

713

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,118
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,931

LEVEL 1

2,066

26%

LEVEL 2

2,747

35%

LEVEL 3

2,128

27%

LEVEL 4

990

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,415
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,673

LEVEL 1

1,964

10%

LEVEL 2

6,294

32%

LEVEL 3

7,036

36%

LEVEL 4

4,379

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,629
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,482

LEVEL 1

1,685

9%

LEVEL 2

5,168

27%

LEVEL 3

7,107

36%

LEVEL 4

5,522

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

914
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,170

LEVEL 1

3,627

51%

LEVEL 2

2,629

37%

LEVEL 3

775

11%

LEVEL 4

139

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1,437
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,384

LEVEL 1

3,292

45%

LEVEL 2

2,655

36%

LEVEL 3

1,151

16%

LEVEL 4

286

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12,242
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,431

LEVEL 1

4,691

18%

LEVEL 2

8,498

33%

LEVEL 3

7,728

30%

LEVEL 4

4,514

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13,890
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,302

LEVEL 1

4,119

16%

LEVEL 2

7,293

29%

LEVEL 3

8,091

32%

LEVEL 4

5,799

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,412

LEVEL 1

900

64%

LEVEL 2

425

30%

LEVEL 3

83

6%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,564

LEVEL 1

858

55%

LEVEL 2

530

34%

LEVEL 3

167

11%

LEVEL 4

9

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,845
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,382

LEVEL 1

1,266

11%

LEVEL 2

3,271

29%

LEVEL 3

3,955

35%

LEVEL 4

2,890

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,323
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,678

LEVEL 1

929

9%

LEVEL 2

2,426

23%

LEVEL 3

3,865

36%

LEVEL 4

3,458

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,484
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,461

LEVEL 1

4,325

28%

LEVEL 2

5,652

37%

LEVEL 3

3,856

25%

LEVEL 4

1,628

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,743
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,188

LEVEL 1

4,048

25%

LEVEL 2

5,397

33%

LEVEL 3

4,393

27%

LEVEL 4

2,350

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.