Skip to Content
Main content

ROCKLAND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,702
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,708

LEVEL 1

2,902

25%

LEVEL 2

4,104

35%

LEVEL 3

3,407

29%

LEVEL 4

1,295

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,298
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,329

LEVEL 1

3,033

25%

LEVEL 2

3,998

32%

LEVEL 3

3,616

29%

LEVEL 4

1,682

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,618
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,630

LEVEL 1

1,115

20%

LEVEL 2

1,897

34%

LEVEL 3

1,809

32%

LEVEL 4

809

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,901
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,914

LEVEL 1

1,178

20%

LEVEL 2

1,835

31%

LEVEL 3

1,857

31%

LEVEL 4

1,044

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,084
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,078

LEVEL 1

1,787

29%

LEVEL 2

2,207

36%

LEVEL 3

1,598

26%

LEVEL 4

486

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,397
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,415

LEVEL 1

1,855

29%

LEVEL 2

2,163

34%

LEVEL 3

1,759

27%

LEVEL 4

638

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

140
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

101

44%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

174
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

110

40%

LEVEL 4

64

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

694
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,158

LEVEL 1

114

10%

LEVEL 2

350

30%

LEVEL 3

461

40%

LEVEL 4

233

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

758
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,179

LEVEL 1

126

11%

LEVEL 2

295

25%

LEVEL 3

446

38%

LEVEL 4

312

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,316
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,088

LEVEL 1

433

11%

LEVEL 2

1,339

33%

LEVEL 3

1,622

40%

LEVEL 4

694

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,471
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,144

LEVEL 1

485

12%

LEVEL 2

1,188

29%

LEVEL 3

1,632

39%

LEVEL 4

839

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

506
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,910

LEVEL 1

650

34%

LEVEL 2

754

39%

LEVEL 3

388

20%

LEVEL 4

118

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

605
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,894

LEVEL 1

603

32%

LEVEL 2

686

36%

LEVEL 3

434

23%

LEVEL 4

171

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,044
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,315

LEVEL 1

1,668

39%

LEVEL 2

1,603

37%

LEVEL 3

834

19%

LEVEL 4

210

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,286
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,828

LEVEL 1

1,779

37%

LEVEL 2

1,763

37%

LEVEL 3

990

21%

LEVEL 4

296

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,562
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,842

LEVEL 1

1,721

17%

LEVEL 2

3,559

36%

LEVEL 3

3,287

33%

LEVEL 4

1,275

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,115
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,468

LEVEL 1

1,934

18%

LEVEL 2

3,419

33%

LEVEL 3

3,458

33%

LEVEL 4

1,657

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

140
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,866

LEVEL 1

1,181

63%

LEVEL 2

545

29%

LEVEL 3

120

6%

LEVEL 4

20

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

183
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,861

LEVEL 1

1,099

59%

LEVEL 2

579

31%

LEVEL 3

158

8%

LEVEL 4

25

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4,655
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,106

LEVEL 1

1,734

17%

LEVEL 2

3,717

37%

LEVEL 3

3,363

33%

LEVEL 4

1,292

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,201
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,349

LEVEL 1

1,725

17%

LEVEL 2

3,423

33%

LEVEL 3

3,526

34%

LEVEL 4

1,675

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,602

LEVEL 1

1,168

73%

LEVEL 2

387

24%

LEVEL 3

44

3%

LEVEL 4

3

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

97
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,980

LEVEL 1

1,308

66%

LEVEL 2

575

29%

LEVEL 3

90

5%

LEVEL 4

7

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,432
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,083

LEVEL 1

701

12%

LEVEL 2

1,950

32%

LEVEL 3

2,390

39%

LEVEL 4

1,042

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,748
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,254

LEVEL 1

745

12%

LEVEL 2

1,761

28%

LEVEL 3

2,480

40%

LEVEL 4

1,268

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,270
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,625

LEVEL 1

2,201

39%

LEVEL 2

2,154

38%

LEVEL 3

1,017

18%

LEVEL 4

253

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,550
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,075

LEVEL 1

2,288

38%

LEVEL 2

2,237

37%

LEVEL 3

1,136

19%

LEVEL 4

414

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.