Skip to Content
Main content

ULSTER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,992
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,384

LEVEL 1

2,069

32%

LEVEL 2

2,323

36%

LEVEL 3

1,484

23%

LEVEL 4

508

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,452
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,859

LEVEL 1

2,066

30%

LEVEL 2

2,341

34%

LEVEL 3

1,777

26%

LEVEL 4

675

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,077

LEVEL 1

816

27%

LEVEL 2

1,123

36%

LEVEL 3

817

27%

LEVEL 4

321

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,378
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,282

LEVEL 1

783

24%

LEVEL 2

1,121

34%

LEVEL 3

975

30%

LEVEL 4

403

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

854
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,307

LEVEL 1

1,253

38%

LEVEL 2

1,200

36%

LEVEL 3

667

20%

LEVEL 4

187

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,074
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,577

LEVEL 1

1,283

36%

LEVEL 2

1,220

34%

LEVEL 3

802

22%

LEVEL 4

272

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

96
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

111

36%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

132
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

107

28%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

118
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

72

32%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

126
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,458
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,043

LEVEL 1

1,077

27%

LEVEL 2

1,508

37%

LEVEL 3

1,082

27%

LEVEL 4

376

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,769
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,334

LEVEL 1

1,094

25%

LEVEL 2

1,471

34%

LEVEL 3

1,274

29%

LEVEL 4

495

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

83
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

270

53%

LEVEL 2

157

31%

LEVEL 3

67

13%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

258

50%

LEVEL 2

166

32%

LEVEL 3

68

13%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

236
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,284

LEVEL 1

569

44%

LEVEL 2

479

37%

LEVEL 3

188

15%

LEVEL 4

48

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

333
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,405

LEVEL 1

568

40%

LEVEL 2

504

36%

LEVEL 3

264

19%

LEVEL 4

69

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,944
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,235

LEVEL 1

1,280

24%

LEVEL 2

2,011

38%

LEVEL 3

1,442

28%

LEVEL 4

502

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,369
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,566

LEVEL 1

1,184

21%

LEVEL 2

2,013

36%

LEVEL 3

1,699

31%

LEVEL 4

670

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

48
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,149

LEVEL 1

789

69%

LEVEL 2

312

27%

LEVEL 3

42

4%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

83
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,293

LEVEL 1

882

68%

LEVEL 2

328

25%

LEVEL 3

78

6%

LEVEL 4

5

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,989
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,172

LEVEL 1

1,903

31%

LEVEL 2

2,280

37%

LEVEL 3

1,481

24%

LEVEL 4

508

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,443
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,628

LEVEL 1

1,906

29%

LEVEL 2

2,279

34%

LEVEL 3

1,769

27%

LEVEL 4

674

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

166

78%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

3

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

160

69%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

8

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,406
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,163

LEVEL 1

586

19%

LEVEL 2

1,171

37%

LEVEL 3

1,011

32%

LEVEL 4

395

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,659
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,374

LEVEL 1

604

18%

LEVEL 2

1,111

33%

LEVEL 3

1,154

34%

LEVEL 4

505

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

586
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,221

LEVEL 1

1,483

46%

LEVEL 2

1,152

36%

LEVEL 3

473

15%

LEVEL 4

113

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

793
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,485

LEVEL 1

1,462

42%

LEVEL 2

1,230

35%

LEVEL 3

623

18%

LEVEL 4

170

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1,989
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,357

LEVEL 1

2,058

32%

LEVEL 2

2,310

36%

LEVEL 3

1,481

23%

LEVEL 4

508

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,450
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,840

LEVEL 1

2,053

30%

LEVEL 2

2,337

34%

LEVEL 3

1,775

26%

LEVEL 4

675

10%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.