Skip to Content
Main content

A M COSGROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

154

40%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

75

16%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

110

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

60

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

74

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

85

45%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

12

71%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

169
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

114

37%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

81

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

97

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

11

58%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

86

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

117

27%

LEVEL 3

152

35%

LEVEL 4

110

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

184
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

153

40%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

263
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

69

15%

LEVEL 2

124

27%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

110

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

54

51%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.