NEW EXPLORATIONS SCI, TECH & MATH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

690
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

18

3%

LEVEL 3

192

27%

LEVEL 4

498

70%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

709
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

18

2%

LEVEL 3

130

18%

LEVEL 4

579

79%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

364
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

276

74%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

376
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

314

83%

MALE

PROFICIENT

326
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

222

66%

MALE

PROFICIENT

333
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

265

76%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

38
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

28

70%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

45
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

41

91%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

225
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

181

79%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

256
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

224

85%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

336
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

236

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

316
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

250

77%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

18

41%

LEVEL 4

24

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

25

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

32

63%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

703
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 723

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

18

2%

LEVEL 3

126

17%

LEVEL 4

577

80%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

604
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

15

2%

LEVEL 3

165

27%

LEVEL 4

439

71%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

618
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

14

2%

LEVEL 3

109

17%

LEVEL 4

509

80%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

59

66%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

70

73%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.