BRONXVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

104

26%

LEVEL 3

169

43%

LEVEL 4

112

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

65

17%

LEVEL 3

144

39%

LEVEL 4

145

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

41

22%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

72

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

86

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

96

46%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

77

40%

LEVEL 4

59

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

12

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

147

45%

LEVEL 4

91

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

237
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

51

17%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

120

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

92

24%

LEVEL 3

168

45%

LEVEL 4

111

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

140

40%

LEVEL 4

144

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

12

57%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

286
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

63

17%

LEVEL 3

142

38%

LEVEL 4

144

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.