RED CREEK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

97

29%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

106

29%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

64

38%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

57

32%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

103

29%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

54

89%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

48

80%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

73

41%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

78

40%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.