Skip to Content
Main content

LINDENHURST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

71

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

47

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

37

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

51

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

29

33%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

71

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

31

62%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

32

68%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

168
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

53

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

32

29%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.