ADDISON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

169

40%

LEVEL 2

169

40%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

136

31%

LEVEL 2

179

41%

LEVEL 3

87

20%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

84

39%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

102

49%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

81

37%

LEVEL 2

95

44%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

162

40%

LEVEL 2

166

41%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

130

31%

LEVEL 2

174

42%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

163

45%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

161

43%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

55

90%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

39

67%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

70

38%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

99

41%

LEVEL 2

104

43%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

94

38%

LEVEL 2

102

41%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.