JOSEPH B RADEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

107

32%

LEVEL 2

138

41%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

58

37%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

50

31%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

69

44%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

57

32%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

116

40%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

128

41%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

84

27%

LEVEL 2

132

43%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

20

95%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

23

79%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

32

24%

LEVEL 2

56

43%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

65

48%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

95

52%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.