CHARLTON HTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

87

39%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

109

48%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

49

43%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

53

46%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

56

50%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

83

40%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

102

47%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

101

51%

LEVEL 4

53

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

84

41%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

95

48%

LEVEL 4

53

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

14

47%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.