PULASKI CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

141

32%

LEVEL 2

191

43%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

122

27%

LEVEL 2

189

43%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

93

44%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

89

38%

LEVEL 2

98

41%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

74

33%

LEVEL 2

101

45%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

185

43%

LEVEL 3

98

23%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

120

28%

LEVEL 2

184

43%

LEVEL 3

98

23%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

93

24%

LEVEL 2

177

46%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

82

22%

LEVEL 2

168

44%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

48

74%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

40

62%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

104

45%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

93

43%

LEVEL 2

87

41%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

101

45%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.