Skip to Content
Main content

C J HOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

85

19%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

118

21%

LEVEL 2

160

29%

LEVEL 3

168

30%

LEVEL 4

106

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

82

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

23

27%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

139

36%

LEVEL 3

128

33%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

141

30%

LEVEL 3

159

34%

LEVEL 4

105

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

40

63%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

55

65%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

212
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

81

18%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

136

31%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

274
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

109

20%

LEVEL 2

159

29%

LEVEL 3

168

31%

LEVEL 4

106

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

9

90%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

72

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

99

25%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

92

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

34

32%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.