Skip to Content
Main content

CAMDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

82

37%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

120

44%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

38

31%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

57

45%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

82

54%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

78

37%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

117

44%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

77

43%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

42

86%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

37

42%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

33

31%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

61

47%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

87

51%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.