Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENS COLLEGE SCHOOL-MATH, SCI, TEC GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

124

42%

LEVEL 4

102

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

53

17%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

137

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

55

36%

LEVEL 4

63

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

60

37%

LEVEL 4

75

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

69

47%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

52

35%

LEVEL 4

62

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

136
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

70

40%

LEVEL 4

66

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

153
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

92

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

12

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

17

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

27

47%

LEVEL 4

15

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

122

43%

LEVEL 4

102

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

111

37%

LEVEL 4

137

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

226
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

124

42%

LEVEL 4

102

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

242
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

137

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

7

70%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

64

45%

LEVEL 4

50

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

65

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

60

39%

LEVEL 4

52

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

72

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.