ALBERT SHANKER SCH-VISUAL/PERF ARTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

169

28%

LEVEL 2

191

31%

LEVEL 3

139

23%

LEVEL 4

108

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

165

26%

LEVEL 2

175

27%

LEVEL 3

143

22%

LEVEL 4

159

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

57

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

90

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

112

33%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

107

30%

LEVEL 2

102

29%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

122
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

65

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

138
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

89

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

42

46%

LEVEL 2

32

35%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

51

46%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

92

33%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

85

29%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

86

18%

LEVEL 2

163

33%

LEVEL 3

135

27%

LEVEL 4

107

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

80

16%

LEVEL 2

143

28%

LEVEL 3

133

26%

LEVEL 4

157

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

83

72%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

85

66%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

242
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

124

23%

LEVEL 2

169

32%

LEVEL 3

135

25%

LEVEL 4

107

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

300
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

133

22%

LEVEL 2

159

27%

LEVEL 3

141

24%

LEVEL 4

159

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

45

63%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

17

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

43

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

159

29%

LEVEL 2

181

33%

LEVEL 3

115

21%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

157

28%

LEVEL 2

164

29%

LEVEL 3

122

22%

LEVEL 4

116

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.