Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #28 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,649
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,038

LEVEL 1

3,472

23%

LEVEL 2

4,917

33%

LEVEL 3

4,058

27%

LEVEL 4

2,591

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,655
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,059

LEVEL 1

3,185

21%

LEVEL 2

4,219

28%

LEVEL 3

4,312

29%

LEVEL 4

3,343

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,725
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,337

LEVEL 1

1,297

18%

LEVEL 2

2,315

32%

LEVEL 3

2,187

30%

LEVEL 4

1,538

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,230
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,390

LEVEL 1

1,185

16%

LEVEL 2

1,975

27%

LEVEL 3

2,244

30%

LEVEL 4

1,986

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,924
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,701

LEVEL 1

2,175

28%

LEVEL 2

2,602

34%

LEVEL 3

1,871

24%

LEVEL 4

1,053

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,425
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,669

LEVEL 1

2,000

26%

LEVEL 2

2,244

29%

LEVEL 3

2,068

27%

LEVEL 4

1,357

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

152
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

80

34%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

197
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

108

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

237
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

129

22%

LEVEL 2

220

38%

LEVEL 3

159

27%

LEVEL 4

78

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

306
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

119

20%

LEVEL 2

168

28%

LEVEL 3

198

33%

LEVEL 4

108

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,606
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,414

LEVEL 1

611

14%

LEVEL 2

1,197

27%

LEVEL 3

1,419

32%

LEVEL 4

1,187

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,906
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,450

LEVEL 1

541

12%

LEVEL 2

1,003

23%

LEVEL 3

1,380

31%

LEVEL 4

1,526

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,236
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,346

LEVEL 1

439

19%

LEVEL 2

671

29%

LEVEL 3

689

29%

LEVEL 4

547

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,386
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,354

LEVEL 1

387

16%

LEVEL 2

581

25%

LEVEL 3

714

30%

LEVEL 4

672

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,069
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,488

LEVEL 1

1,097

31%

LEVEL 2

1,322

38%

LEVEL 3

769

22%

LEVEL 4

300

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,280
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,360

LEVEL 1

968

29%

LEVEL 2

1,112

33%

LEVEL 3

882

26%

LEVEL 4

398

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,349
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,967

LEVEL 1

1,165

29%

LEVEL 2

1,453

37%

LEVEL 3

950

24%

LEVEL 4

399

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,580
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,033

LEVEL 1

1,144

28%

LEVEL 2

1,309

32%

LEVEL 3

1,049

26%

LEVEL 4

531

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,372
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,333

LEVEL 1

1,875

15%

LEVEL 2

4,086

33%

LEVEL 3

3,823

31%

LEVEL 4

2,549

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,213
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,343

LEVEL 1

1,774

14%

LEVEL 2

3,356

27%

LEVEL 3

3,965

32%

LEVEL 4

3,248

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

277
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,705

LEVEL 1

1,597

59%

LEVEL 2

831

31%

LEVEL 3

235

9%

LEVEL 4

42

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

442
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,716

LEVEL 1

1,411

52%

LEVEL 2

863

32%

LEVEL 3

347

13%

LEVEL 4

95

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,561
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,577

LEVEL 1

2,527

19%

LEVEL 2

4,489

33%

LEVEL 3

3,979

29%

LEVEL 4

2,582

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,482
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,418

LEVEL 1

2,239

17%

LEVEL 2

3,697

28%

LEVEL 3

4,150

31%

LEVEL 4

3,332

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

88
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,461

LEVEL 1

945

65%

LEVEL 2

428

29%

LEVEL 3

79

5%

LEVEL 4

9

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,641

LEVEL 1

946

58%

LEVEL 2

522

32%

LEVEL 3

162

10%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,056
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,538

LEVEL 1

934

17%

LEVEL 2

1,548

28%

LEVEL 3

1,642

30%

LEVEL 4

1,414

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,067
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,665

LEVEL 1

581

12%

LEVEL 2

1,017

22%

LEVEL 3

1,480

32%

LEVEL 4

1,587

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,593
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,500

LEVEL 1

2,538

27%

LEVEL 2

3,369

35%

LEVEL 3

2,416

25%

LEVEL 4

1,177

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,588
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,394

LEVEL 1

2,604

25%

LEVEL 2

3,202

31%

LEVEL 3

2,832

27%

LEVEL 4

1,756

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.