Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 8 RICHARD S GROSSLEY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

115

38%

LEVEL 2

122

40%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

105

34%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

41

27%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

69

47%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

64

41%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

22

40%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

17

30%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

65

46%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

23

35%

LEVEL 2

30

46%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

26

39%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

110

44%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

43

75%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

35

70%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

110

41%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

81

30%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

25

64%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

24

73%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

101

38%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.