Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #26 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,518
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,031

LEVEL 1

882

8%

LEVEL 2

2,631

24%

LEVEL 3

3,901

35%

LEVEL 4

3,617

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,176
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,213

LEVEL 1

887

8%

LEVEL 2

2,150

19%

LEVEL 3

3,907

35%

LEVEL 4

4,269

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,922
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,264

LEVEL 1

276

5%

LEVEL 2

1,066

20%

LEVEL 3

1,873

36%

LEVEL 4

2,049

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,178
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,337

LEVEL 1

286

5%

LEVEL 2

873

16%

LEVEL 3

1,882

35%

LEVEL 4

2,296

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,596
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,767

LEVEL 1

606

11%

LEVEL 2

1,565

27%

LEVEL 3

2,028

35%

LEVEL 4

1,568

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,998
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,876

LEVEL 1

601

10%

LEVEL 2

1,277

22%

LEVEL 3

2,025

34%

LEVEL 4

1,973

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

108
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

63

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

134
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

66

38%

LEVEL 4

68

39%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

33
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

43
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

25

41%

LEVEL 4

18

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5,026
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,746

LEVEL 1

386

6%

LEVEL 2

1,334

20%

LEVEL 3

2,395

36%

LEVEL 4

2,631

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5,406
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,926

LEVEL 1

418

6%

LEVEL 2

1,102

16%

LEVEL 3

2,340

34%

LEVEL 4

3,066

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,271
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,052

LEVEL 1

204

10%

LEVEL 2

577

28%

LEVEL 3

743

36%

LEVEL 4

528

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,314
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,961

LEVEL 1

176

9%

LEVEL 2

471

24%

LEVEL 3

685

35%

LEVEL 4

629

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

287
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

84

15%

LEVEL 2

194

34%

LEVEL 3

182

32%

LEVEL 4

105

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

361
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

83

14%

LEVEL 2

140

24%

LEVEL 3

226

39%

LEVEL 4

135

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

793
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,466

LEVEL 1

196

13%

LEVEL 2

477

33%

LEVEL 3

514

35%

LEVEL 4

279

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

918
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,505

LEVEL 1

193

13%

LEVEL 2

394

26%

LEVEL 3

565

38%

LEVEL 4

353

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,184
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,568

LEVEL 1

389

4%

LEVEL 2

1,995

21%

LEVEL 3

3,629

38%

LEVEL 4

3,555

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,721
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,671

LEVEL 1

420

4%

LEVEL 2

1,530

16%

LEVEL 3

3,552

37%

LEVEL 4

4,169

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

334
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,463

LEVEL 1

493

34%

LEVEL 2

636

43%

LEVEL 3

272

19%

LEVEL 4

62

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

455
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,542

LEVEL 1

467

30%

LEVEL 2

620

40%

LEVEL 3

355

23%

LEVEL 4

100

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,457
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,530

LEVEL 1

636

6%

LEVEL 2

2,437

23%

LEVEL 3

3,846

37%

LEVEL 4

3,611

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,065
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,576

LEVEL 1

594

6%

LEVEL 2

1,917

18%

LEVEL 3

3,808

36%

LEVEL 4

4,257

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

246

49%

LEVEL 2

194

39%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

111
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

293

46%

LEVEL 2

233

37%

LEVEL 3

99

16%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,041
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,463

LEVEL 1

329

6%

LEVEL 2

1,093

20%

LEVEL 3

1,933

35%

LEVEL 4

2,108

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,140
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,206

LEVEL 1

257

5%

LEVEL 2

809

16%

LEVEL 3

1,807

35%

LEVEL 4

2,333

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,477
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,568

LEVEL 1

553

10%

LEVEL 2

1,538

28%

LEVEL 3

1,968

35%

LEVEL 4

1,509

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,036
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,007

LEVEL 1

630

10%

LEVEL 2

1,341

22%

LEVEL 3

2,100

35%

LEVEL 4

1,936

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.