Skip to Content
Main content

PS 199 MAURICE A FITZGERALD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

151

28%

LEVEL 2

165

30%

LEVEL 3

158

29%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

100

22%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

60

26%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

103
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

95
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

55

37%

LEVEL 4

40

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

107
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

120

36%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

107
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

63

23%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

142

33%

LEVEL 3

151

35%

LEVEL 4

70

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

76

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

85

74%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

54

59%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

206
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

112

30%

LEVEL 3

136

37%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

190
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

114

36%

LEVEL 4

76

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

98

57%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

66

45%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.