Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #22 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,392
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,364

LEVEL 1

3,115

22%

LEVEL 2

4,857

34%

LEVEL 3

3,983

28%

LEVEL 4

2,409

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,038
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,290

LEVEL 1

2,855

20%

LEVEL 2

4,397

31%

LEVEL 3

4,274

30%

LEVEL 4

2,764

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,556
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,998

LEVEL 1

1,176

17%

LEVEL 2

2,266

32%

LEVEL 3

2,112

30%

LEVEL 4

1,444

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,919
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,956

LEVEL 1

1,016

15%

LEVEL 2

2,021

29%

LEVEL 3

2,270

33%

LEVEL 4

1,649

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,836
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,366

LEVEL 1

1,939

26%

LEVEL 2

2,591

35%

LEVEL 3

1,871

25%

LEVEL 4

965

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,119
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,334

LEVEL 1

1,839

25%

LEVEL 2

2,376

32%

LEVEL 3

2,004

27%

LEVEL 4

1,115

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

83
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

40

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

87
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

40

28%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

48
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

55
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,380
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,484

LEVEL 1

404

16%

LEVEL 2

700

28%

LEVEL 3

754

30%

LEVEL 4

626

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,587
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,568

LEVEL 1

378

15%

LEVEL 2

603

23%

LEVEL 3

832

32%

LEVEL 4

755

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,346
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,098

LEVEL 1

605

15%

LEVEL 2

1,147

28%

LEVEL 3

1,365

33%

LEVEL 4

981

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,538
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,138

LEVEL 1

555

13%

LEVEL 2

1,045

25%

LEVEL 3

1,407

34%

LEVEL 4

1,131

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,817
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,346

LEVEL 1

1,439

27%

LEVEL 2

2,090

39%

LEVEL 3

1,301

24%

LEVEL 4

516

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,912
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,082

LEVEL 1

1,342

26%

LEVEL 2

1,828

36%

LEVEL 3

1,364

27%

LEVEL 4

548

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

718
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,168

LEVEL 1

619

29%

LEVEL 2

831

38%

LEVEL 3

493

23%

LEVEL 4

225

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

859
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,232

LEVEL 1

533

24%

LEVEL 2

840

38%

LEVEL 3

588

26%

LEVEL 4

271

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,003
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,412

LEVEL 1

1,585

14%

LEVEL 2

3,824

34%

LEVEL 3

3,673

32%

LEVEL 4

2,330

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,483
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,259

LEVEL 1

1,467

13%

LEVEL 2

3,309

29%

LEVEL 3

3,844

34%

LEVEL 4

2,639

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

389
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,952

LEVEL 1

1,530

52%

LEVEL 2

1,033

35%

LEVEL 3

310

11%

LEVEL 4

79

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

555
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,031

LEVEL 1

1,388

46%

LEVEL 2

1,088

36%

LEVEL 3

430

14%

LEVEL 4

125

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,330
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,037

LEVEL 1

2,232

17%

LEVEL 2

4,475

34%

LEVEL 3

3,927

30%

LEVEL 4

2,403

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,862
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,684

LEVEL 1

1,967

16%

LEVEL 2

3,855

30%

LEVEL 3

4,109

32%

LEVEL 4

2,753

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

62
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,327

LEVEL 1

883

67%

LEVEL 2

382

29%

LEVEL 3

56

4%

LEVEL 4

6

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,606

LEVEL 1

888

55%

LEVEL 2

542

34%

LEVEL 3

165

10%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,629
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,500

LEVEL 1

581

13%

LEVEL 2

1,290

29%

LEVEL 3

1,460

32%

LEVEL 4

1,169

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,516
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,849

LEVEL 1

403

10%

LEVEL 2

930

24%

LEVEL 3

1,358

35%

LEVEL 4

1,158

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,763
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,864

LEVEL 1

2,534

26%

LEVEL 2

3,567

36%

LEVEL 3

2,523

26%

LEVEL 4

1,240

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,522
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,441

LEVEL 1

2,452

23%

LEVEL 2

3,467

33%

LEVEL 3

2,916

28%

LEVEL 4

1,606

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.