Skip to Content
Main content

PS 288 SHIRLEY TANYHILL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

194

50%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

163

42%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

71

40%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

112

57%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

92

44%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

21

68%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

98

46%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

96

44%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

72

55%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

47

35%

LEVEL 2

56

42%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

102

38%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

87

33%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

92

76%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

76

61%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

169

47%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

139

39%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

25

89%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

30

56%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

164

49%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

151

42%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.