Skip to Content
Main content

PS 99 ISAAC ASIMOV GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

145

29%

LEVEL 2

165

33%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

71

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

140

26%

LEVEL 2

154

29%

LEVEL 3

160

30%

LEVEL 4

84

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

86

36%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

96

36%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

80
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

106
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

30

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

20

39%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

37

44%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

91

22%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

89

20%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

54

59%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

189
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

61

17%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

235
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

153

39%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

84

64%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

93

62%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

48

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

37

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

97

34%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

123

30%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.